|
2002 Annual Rpt |
| RELATED LINKS | |
 |
PA DEP |
|
|
PA DEP, Mining and Mineral Resources |
|
|
PA DEP, Water Management |
|
|
USGS PA Mine Drainage Projects |
|
|
Mine Drainage Newsletter |
1999 Pennsylvania AMD Inventory
Meta Data Report
Introduction:
This report characterizes the status and content of the Harrisburg Field Office’s (HFO) Pennsylvania AMD Inventory (AMDI) The AMDI was compiled from databases and printouts of data from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) Mine Drainage Inventory (MDI) and various other PADEP maintained computer database systems, including the PADEP LUMIS system. More specifically, five database sources from various time periods were combined to create the HFO AMDI. Those database sources were: a 1994 printout from the MDI of discharges from surface mines (only data source that includes water quality and quantity data); a 1996 printout from the MDI of permits where if treatment were discontinued potentially serious downstream impacts would occur; a current copy of the BAMR (Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation) bond forfeiture database; a 1999 printed list from LUMIS of sites where surface reclamation was complete, but bond release was being withheld due to a pollutional discharge; a printout from the MDI of primacy permits with discharges; and the Pennsylvania Inspectable Units List (IUL) database.
Appendices
Appendix A contains data dictionaries (where available) for the individual PADEP database sources.
Appendix B contains a scanned copy of the PADEP document that established the state inventory.
HFO AMDI Data Dictionary
The HFO AMDI database contains two tables or data files. They are the Master1 table and the Seep table. The Master1 table contains 500 unique permits where a pollutional discharge was identified in one of the inventory database sources. The Seep table contains 376 detail records about the water quality and quantity of the discharges for the permits in the Master1 database. However, only 211 of the Master1 records have a detail record in the Seep table. Where a relationship exists between the two tables, there is a one (Master1) to many (Seep) relationship. The key field for relating both tables to one another is the permit number (permit_num) field in each table.
Note: The database container (.DBC) was created in Visual FoxPro 6. The tables Master1.DBF and Seep.DBF must be accessed through this database container.
Structure for table: MASTER1.DBF
Number of data records: 500
| Field | Field Name | Type | Width | Dec | Description |
|
1 |
PERMIT_NUM |
Character |
15 |
Key Field. The permit number field was taken from each of the database sources. As the sources were combined a unique permit number was enforced. |
|
|
2 |
COMPANY |
Character |
40 |
The company name is the name of the company that holds the permit (permittee). |
|
|
3 |
FACTYPE |
Character |
5 |
This is the type of facility or mine. A- Surface, B- Underground, C- . The source is the IUL table. |
|
|
4 |
COUNTY |
Character |
30 |
This is the name of the county in which the permit is located. The source is the IUL table. |
|
|
5 |
COUNTYCODE |
Character |
10 |
This is the FIPS code for the county in which the permit is located. The source is the IUL table. |
|
|
6 |
PERMTYPE |
Character |
2 |
This is a code to indicate under which program the permit was issued. IP- Interim Program, PP- Permanent Program. The source is the IUL table. |
|
|
7 |
PERMSTATUS |
Character |
3 |
This is the activity status of the permit. A- Active, IN- Inactive, BR- Bond Release, AB- Abandoned in bond forfeiture. This data may be out of date. The source is the IUL table. |
|
|
8 |
MAJ_IMPACT |
Character |
1 |
A yes or no field indicating whether a significant adverse impact would occur if treatment were ceased. The source is the printout from the State AMD inventory indicating that if treatment were ceased...... |
|
|
9 |
PERMACRES |
Numeric |
7 |
1 |
The number of acres permitted for surface disturbance. The source is the IUL table. |
|
10 |
PERMEXP |
Date |
8 |
The date the permit expires. Data may be out of date. The source is the IUL table. |
|
|
11 |
PERMISSUE |
Date |
8 |
The original date the permit was issued. The source is the IUL table. |
|
|
12 |
TWP |
Character |
20 |
This is the township in which the pemrit is located. Source ? |
|
|
13 |
MINE_NAME |
Character |
20 |
The name to which the mine is commonly referred. The source is the IUL table. |
|
|
14 |
BONDTYPE |
Character |
20 |
The type of bond posted whether surety or cash. Source is the 1998 list of permits with discharges. |
|
|
15 |
BONDAMT |
Currency |
8 |
4 |
The amount of bond posted for the permit. Source is the 1998 list of pemrits with discharges in the major impact list. |
|
16 |
COST_EST |
Currency |
8 |
4 |
The estimated annual treatment cost for the discharges on the permit. Source is the major impact list. |
|
17 |
TREAT_TYPE |
Character |
4 |
The type of treatment either passive or chemical being employed to treat the discharges. Source the LUMIS list. |
|
|
18 |
REC_STATUS |
Character |
3 |
Reclamation status of the permit. REC indicates that all surface reclamation is complete. This list of fully reclaimed sites may not be complete. Source is the LUMIS list. |
|
|
19 |
BND_FORF |
Character |
1 |
A yes or no field indicating that the site has completed bond forfeiture action. Source is the BAMR database of bond forfeited sites. |
The source of the seep table is a 1994 printout from the PA AMD database showing water quality and quantity information for surface mines in the inventory at that time.
Structure for table: SEEP.DBF
Number of data records: 376
|
Field |
Field Name |
Type |
Width |
Dec |
Description |
|
1 |
PERMIT_NUM |
Character |
15 |
Key Field. The pemrit number assigned by the permitting authority. There may be many of the same permit number with unique discharge IDs. |
|
|
2 |
DISCHRG_ID |
Character |
10 |
An number to identify each individual pollutional discharge on a permit. |
|
|
3 |
FLOW |
Numeric |
6 |
1 |
The flow rate in gallons per minute for the discharge. |
|
4 |
PH |
Numeric |
4 |
2 |
The pH of the discharge. |
|
5 |
TOT_ACIDTY |
Numeric |
8 |
2 |
The total acidity of the discharge in milligrams per liter. |
|
6 |
ACID_LOAD |
Numeric |
8 |
1 |
A calculated field based on the flow and the total acidity of the discharge. The formula for calculating the load was ??? |
|
7 |
TOT_ALK |
Numeric |
8 |
2 |
The total alkalinity of the discharge in milligrams per liter. |
|
8 |
NET_ACIDTY |
Numeric |
8 |
2 |
A calculated field generated by subtracting alkalinity from acidity. A negative number indicates an alkaline discharge. |
|
9 |
SULFATES |
Numeric |
8 |
2 |
The sulfate level of the discharge in milligrams per liter. |
|
10 |
SULF_LOAD |
Numeric |
8 |
1 |
A calculated field based on the flow and the sulfate level of the discharge. |
|
11 |
IRON |
Numeric |
8 |
2 |
The iron level in the discharge in milligrams per liter. |
|
12 |
IRON_LOAD |
Numeric |
8 |
1 |
A calculated field based on the flow and the iron level of the discharge. |
|
13 |
MANGANESE |
Numeric |
8 |
2 |
The manganese level in the discharge in milligrams per liter. |
|
14 |
MANG_LOAD |
Numeric |
8 |
1 |
A calculated field based on the flow and the manganese level of the discharge. |
Appendix A
AMD Seep Inventory
Table Name: seep.dbf
This data was supplied to OSM on January 12, 1995, in the form of a printed report, no digital data was provided. These printed reports were entered into digital format via scanning and optical character recognition (OCR). This printed report does not represent the complete database as maintained by PADEP. Only discharges from surface mines are included.
This table contains information on all discharges from Pennsylvania surface coal mines as of the end of 1994. In some instances, there are many discharges listed for a single permit.
This table has been supplemented with fields from other tables. The Pennsylvania Inspectable Units List (IUL) and the BAMR bond forfeiture table were used. The data was merged using a Visual FoxPro (VFP) program that searched the IUL and bond forfeiture tables for permit numbers from the seep.dbf. Where a match was found the fields were merged into the seep table. Additionally, several calculated fields were generated including net acidity and load.
Structure for table: SEEP.DBF
Number of data records: 376
|
Field Name |
Type |
Width |
Dec |
Description |
|
PERMIT_NUM |
Character |
15 |
The number of the permit (i.e., permit number) |
|
|
PERMISSUE |
Date |
8 |
The issue date of the permit. |
|
|
FACTYPE |
Character |
5 |
The type of facility.(A-Surface, B-Underground, C- Preparation Plant, D- Ancillary, E- Refuse Impoundment, F- Tipple |
|
|
COMPANY |
Character |
40 |
The name of the permittee of the mining operation. |
|
|
COUNTY |
Character |
30 |
Name of the county in which the mine is located. |
|
|
FIPS |
Character |
10 |
FIPS State code. |
|
|
STATE |
Character |
2 |
State abbreviation. |
|
|
COUNTYCODE |
Character |
3 |
County FIPS code. |
|
|
BONDFORF |
Character |
1 |
Bond Forfeiture yes or no. |
|
|
BONDAMT |
Numeric |
12 |
2 |
The amount of bond currently held. |
|
MINE_NAME |
Character |
20 |
Name the mine is known by. |
|
|
PERMTYPE |
Character |
2 |
The type of permit whether IP - Interim Program, PP - Permanent Program, NP- No Permit. |
|
|
PERMSTATUS |
Character |
3 |
The activity status of the permit. A-Active, IN- Inactive, BR- Bond Released, AB- Abandoned. (From MSE form.) |
|
|
PERMACRES |
Numeric |
7 |
1 |
Acres permitted for surface disturbance. |
|
PERMEXP |
Date |
8 |
Date of permit expiration. |
|
|
DISCHRG_ID |
Character |
10 |
Identification number of the discharge (specific to each permit). |
|
|
FLOW |
Numeric |
6 |
1 |
The flow rate (volume) of the discharge in gallons per minute. |
|
PH |
Numeric |
4 |
2 |
The pH of the discharge. |
|
TOT_ACIDTY |
Numeric |
8 |
2 |
The total acidity of the discharge in milligrams per liter. |
|
ACID_LOAD |
Numeric |
8 |
1 |
The acid load produced by the discharge in pounds per day. |
|
TOT_ALK |
Numeric |
8 |
2 |
The total alkalinity of the discharge in milligrams per liter. |
|
NET_ACIDTY |
Numeric |
8 |
2 |
A calculated field generated by subtracting total alkalinity from total acidity. |
|
SULFATES |
Numeric |
8 |
2 |
The sulfates content of the discharge in milligrams per liter. |
|
SULF_LOAD |
Numeric |
8 |
1 |
The sulfate load produced by the discharge in pounds per day. |
|
IRON |
Numeric |
8 |
2 |
The iron content of the discharge in milligrams per liter. |
|
IRON_LOAD |
Numeric |
8 |
1 |
The iron load produced by the discharge in pounds per day. |
|
MANGANESE |
Numeric |
8 |
2 |
The manganese content of the discharge in milligrams per liter. |
|
MANG_LOAD |
Numeric |
8 |
1 |
The manganese load produced by the discharge in pounds per day. |
|
TWP |
Character |
20 |
The name of the township in which the mine is located. |
** Total ** 289
High AMD Impact Inventory
This table represents a subset of the PADEP MDI as of about 1996. It is a report showing the sites with the highest potential for serious environmental impact if treatment were discontinued. This data was supplied to OSM in hard copy format. These printed reports were entered into digital format via scanning and optical character recognition (OCR). There are 51 permits in this table.
This table was supplemented with fields from other tables. The Pennsylvania Inspectable Units List (IUL) and the BAMR bond forfeiture table were used. The data was merged using a Visual FoxPro (VFP) program that searched the IUL and bond forfeiture tables for permit numbers from the pa_active.dbf. Where a match was found the fields were merged.
Structure for table: PA_ACTIVE.DBF
Number of data records: 51
|
Field Names: |
Description |
|
PERMIT_NUM |
This is the state permit number assigned to the operation. |
|
COMPANY |
This is the name of the permittee. |
|
TWP |
The name of the township in which the permit is located. |
|
COUNTY |
The name of the county in which the permit is located. |
|
SITE TYPE |
The type of mining operation. Types include:
|
|
BONDAMOUNT |
The amount of bond posted on the site. |
|
COST_EST |
The estimated annual treatment costs for the discharges on the site. |
|
DIST_OFFCE |
The PADEP District office from which the permit is regulated. |
Bond Forfeiture Inventory
File name: bf_amd.dbf,
The bond forfeiture inventory is supplied, in digital format, to OSM by PADEP on a quarterly basis or as requested. The inventory is uploaded to the \BMR_BF directory on the Harrisburg Field Office FTP Server. The PADEP contact for the upload is Brian Bradley, Hydrogeologist, Division of Mine Hazards, Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation (BAMR), P.O. Box 8476, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8467 (phone: 717-783-2268).
A subset of the bond forfeiture database supplied by PADEP was created using the command {copy to bf_amd for amd = 'Y' .AND. ABAND>CTOD('08/01/82')}. This created a new database of only sites with AMD that were abandoned after Pennsylvania primacy. There are 152 records in the subset database.
It should be noted that the field AMD Y/N does not always mean a discharge. It could also mean, for example, acid water in a pit.
Structure for table: D:\DATA\AMD INVENTORY\BF_AMD.DBF
Number of data records: 152
Memo file block size: 64
|
Field Name |
Type |
Width |
Dec |
Description |
|
COMPANY |
Character |
40 |
Name of the company holding the permit. |
|
|
PERMIT_NUM |
Character |
15 |
This is the state permit number assigned to the operation. |
|
|
COUNTY |
Character |
30 |
The county in which the permit is located. |
|
|
COUNTYCODE |
Character |
3 |
The county FIPS code. |
|
|
DISTRICT |
Character |
15 |
The PADEP District office from which the permit is regulated. |
|
|
MINE_NAME |
Character |
20 |
Name the mine is known by. |
|
|
FACTYPE |
Character |
5 |
The type of facility.(A-Surface, B-Underground, C- Preparation Plant, D- Ancillary, E- Refuse Impoundment, F- Tipple |
|
| MINE_TYPE | Character | 7 | ||
|
PERMTYPE |
Character |
2 |
The type of permit whether IP - Interim Program, PP - Permanent Program, NP- No Permit. |
|
|
PERMSTATUS |
Character |
3 |
The activity status of the permit. A-Active, IN- Inactive, BR- Bond Released, AB- Abandoned. (From MSE form.) |
|
|
PERMACRES |
Numeric |
7 |
1 |
Acres permitted for surface disturbance. |
|
PERMEXP |
Date |
8 |
Date of permit expiration. |
|
|
PERMISSUE |
Date |
8 |
The issue date of the permit. |
|
|
TWP |
Character |
20 |
The name of the township in which the mine is located. |
|
|
TREAT_TYPE |
Character |
4 |
||
|
REC_STATUS |
Character |
3 |
** Total ** 191
Bond Forfeiture Inventory
File name: bf_amd.dbf,
The bond forfeiture inventory is supplied, in digital format, to OSM by PADEP on a quarterly basis or as requested. The inventory is uploaded to the \BMR_BF directory on the Harrisburg Field Office FTP Server. The PADEP contact for the upload is Brian Bradley, Hydrogeologist, Division of Mine Hazards, Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation (BAMR), P.O. Box 8476, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8467 (phone: 717-783-2268).
A subset of the bond forfeiture database supplied by PADEP was created using the command {copy to bf_amd for amd = 'Y' .AND. ABAND>CTOD('08/01/82')}. This created a new database of only sites with AMD that were abandoned after Pennsylvania primacy. There are 152 records in the subset database.
It should be noted that the field AMD Y/N does not always mean a discharge. It could also mean, for example, acid water in a pit.
Structure for table: D:\DATA\AMD INVENTORY\BF_AMD.DBF
Number of data records: 152
Memo file block size: 64
|
Field |
Field Name |
Type |
Width/Dec |
Description |
|
|
1 |
BF_ID_ |
Numeric |
11 |
An ID number assigned by BAMR. |
|
|
2 |
ABAND |
Date |
8 |
Date the site was declared abandoned or the last coal was removed. (Source: BAMR invest). |
|
|
3 |
ABANDONED_ |
Character |
12 |
||
|
4 |
ACRES_NEED |
Numeric |
20/5 |
Acres needing reclaimed. |
|
|
5 |
ADOBE |
Logical |
1 |
Is this site related to the Adobe Company large scale forfeiture. |
|
|
6 |
AFFAC |
Numeric |
20/5 |
Affected acres by the mine operator. (Source: BAMR investigation.) |
|
|
7 |
AMD |
Character |
1 |
Presence of Acid Mine Discharge related to the site [N=No AMD; Y= discharge exists] (Source: BAMR investigation.) |
|
|
8 |
ASSIGNDATE |
Date |
8 |
Date the BF case was assigned for project development. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
9 |
AWARD |
Date |
8 |
Date the project was awarded. (Source: Engineering and Contracts.) |
|
|
10 |
BF_TYPE |
Character |
9 |
Type of permit being forfeited. BF-surface mine forfeiture; DMF-deep mine forfeiture; NCF-non-coal forfeiture; CRF-coal refuse permit. |
|
|
11 |
BFNUMBER |
Character |
9 |
Bond forfeiture project number assigned to a site when it is sent from project development to design as a reclamation project. (Source: BAMR investigation) |
|
|
12 |
BID |
Date |
8 |
Date the project was put out for bids. (Source: Engineering and Contracts) |
|
|
13 |
NO_BID |
Character |
8 |
||
|
14 |
BNDAC |
Numeric |
20/5 |
Bonded acres of the permit. (Source: BMR records) |
|
|
15 |
BOND |
Numeric |
20/5 |
Amount of bond forfeited on the site. (Source: BMR records, Forf Letter) |
|
|
16 |
BONDFUND |
Character |
1 |
Eligibility for bond pool funds. |
|
|
17 |
BONDTYPE |
Character |
12 |
Type of bond (surety, cash, etc.) |
|
|
18 |
CATEGORY |
Character |
8 |
A system of codes which provide the project status. (Source: BMR investigation) |
|
|
19 |
CN |
Character |
8 |
Forf case number. (Source: BAMR records) |
|
|
20 |
COALRES |
Character |
1 |
Estimation of existence fo coal reserves and potential for remining. [1=definite reserves which are mineable; 2= probable reserves which are mineable; 3= questionable reserves which are mineable; 4= no reserves or not mineable.] (Source: BAMR investigation) |
|
|
21 |
COLLECT |
Date |
8 |
Date the bonds were collected. (Source: BMR records (collection notice) |
|
|
22 |
COLLECTION |
Character |
90 |
||
|
23 |
COLBND |
Numeric |
20/5 |
The bond collected on the forfeited site. (Source: BMR records, collection notices.) |
|
|
24 |
COMP |
Date |
8 |
Date the reclamation project was completed. (Source: Engineering and Crontracts) |
|
|
25 |
COMNT |
Character |
60 |
A brief comment explaining the status of a project, used in the Quarterly Report. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
26 |
COUNTY |
Character |
45 |
County(s) names in which the mining occurred. (Source: BMR records.) |
|
|
27 |
DATE_LUMIS |
Date |
8 |
||
|
28 |
DATE_FULL_ |
Date |
8 |
||
|
29 |
DESIGN_ASS |
Date |
8 |
||
|
30 |
DEVAC |
Numeric |
20/5 |
The acreage estimated during project development that requires some type of reclamation. (Source: BAMR investigation.) |
|
|
31 |
DEVCOST |
Numeric |
20/5 |
The cost of reclamation as estimated during Project Development. (Source: BAMR investigation) |
|
|
## |
DEVCOSTAC |
Estimated per acre reclamation cost. (Source: derived [DEVCOST / DEVAC]) |
|||
|
32 |
FILE_LABEL |
Date |
8 |
||
|
33 |
FORFT |
Date |
8 |
Date the site was declared forfeited. (Source: BMR records) |
|
|
34 |
FORLETRECV |
Date |
8 |
Date on which BAMR received its copy of the forfeiture letter. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
35 |
FUNDTYPE |
Character |
8 |
Type of finding for a planned recl proj. [B= bond forf; O=collected bond plus OSM funding; I=interim program funding; IR=interim program rejected (no PR-1 or PR-2)] (Source: BAMR investigation) |
|
|
36 |
INTERIM |
Character |
1 |
||
|
37 |
IS_REPORT_ |
Logical |
1 |
||
|
38 |
ISSUE |
Date |
8 |
Date the permit was issued. (Source:BMR records) |
|
|
39 |
MAPUPDATE |
Character |
3 |
The date on which Drafting updated the AML maps for the site. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
40 |
MDPNO |
Character |
20 |
Mine Drainage permit number of surface mine permit number. (Source: BMR records.) |
|
|
41 |
MEMO |
Memo |
10 |
An unlimited, unstructured area for comments similar to the Comment Application in LUMIS. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
42 |
MINEPERMIT |
Character |
30 |
The forfeited mining permits or bonding increments. (Source: BMR records) |
|
|
43 |
ONHOLDTIL |
Date |
8 |
A date until which a project is temporarily delayed for various reasons, i.e., possible remining, pending legal actions. (Source: BAMR investigation.) |
|
|
44 |
OPERATOR |
Character |
45 |
The mining company (Source: BMR records.) |
|
|
45 |
OSM |
Character |
1 |
||
|
46 |
PANUMBER |
Character |
11 |
Problem Area number form the NALIS system. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
47 |
PAQUADNAME |
Character |
30 |
The name of the USGS 7.5' quadrangle map. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
48 |
PASSIVE_TR |
Logical |
1 |
Passive treatment? |
|
|
49 |
PITAC |
Numeric |
20/5 |
Number of acres of open pit. (Source: BAMR investigation) |
|
|
50 |
PLANS_PROV |
Character |
100 |
||
|
51 |
PRIOR |
Character |
3 |
Site priority based on hazards. (Source: BAMR investigation.) |
|
|
52 |
PROJAC |
Numeric |
20/5 |
The acreage actually included in a reclamation project. (Source: Engineering and contracting [bid documents of final change orders]) |
|
|
53 |
PROJCOOR |
Character |
20 |
The Div of Mine Hazards Project Coordinator responsible for the Project Development. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
54 |
PROJCOST |
Numeric |
20/5 |
The actual bid or final cost of a const proj. (Source: Engineering & contracts [bid documents or final change orders]) |
|
|
## |
PROJCOSTAC |
Actual per acre reclamation cost. (Source: derived [projcost / projac]) |
|||
|
55 |
PSAAFFAC |
Numeric |
20/5 |
The total acreage affected by the operator as estimated during the preliminary site assessment. (Source: BAMR investigation.) |
|
|
56 |
PSACOST |
Numeric |
20/5 |
The cost of reclamation as estimated during the preliminary site assessment. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
57 |
PSANEEDAC |
Numeric |
20/5 |
The acreage estimated during the preliminary site assessment that requires some type of reclamation. This field is no longer used.. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
58 |
PSAPITAC |
Numeric |
20/5 |
The acreage of open pit as estimated during the preliminary site assessment. This field is no longer used.. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
59 |
PSAPROJCOR |
Character |
20 |
The Division of Mine Hazards Project Coordinator responsible for the preliminary assessment. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
60 |
PSARECLMAC |
Numeric |
20/5 |
The acreage that is adequately reclaimed (no work required) as estimated during the preliminary site assessment. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
61 |
PSAREPDATE |
Date |
8 |
The date the preliminary site assessment was completed. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
62 |
PSASGNDATE |
Date |
8 |
Date the project was assigned for the preliminary site assessment. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
63 |
PSATOBMR |
Date |
8 |
The date the preliminary site assessment was entered on LUMIS. This field is no longer used. (Source: BAMR investigation.) |
|
|
64 |
RECLMAC |
Numeric |
20/5 |
The acreage that is adequately reclaimed (no work required) (Source: BAMR investigation) |
|
|
65 |
REPDATE |
Date |
8 |
The date the project development report was completed (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
66 |
SECTION |
Character |
3 |
||
|
67 |
SMPCONFLCT |
Logical |
1 |
Indicates possibility of conflict with permit that has been recently applied for or issued. Y=Possible conflict; N= No conflict.. (Source: BMR records (permit application)) |
|
|
68 |
TOCOLLECT |
Date |
8 |
Date to bonds were sent for collection. (Source: BMR records) |
|
|
69 |
TOCOLRECVD |
Date |
8 |
Date on which BAMR received the "to collection" transmittal memo. (Source: BAMR invest) |
|
|
70 |
TWP |
Character |
45 |
Township of the mine. (Source: BMR records) |
|
|
71 |
TREES_ADDR |
Logical |
1 |
||
|
72 |
TREE_PLANT |
Logical |
1 |
||
|
73 |
WETAC |
Numeric |
20/5 |
The acreage of wetlands either created by the Dept as a result of reclamation or water bodies left in place at the request of the property owner (sed ponds). (Source: BAMR investigation.) |
|
|
74 |
ACT_43 |
Character |
30 |
||
** Total ** 1162
| Contact
Information: Office of Surface Mining Appalachian Regional Office 3 Parkway Center Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Phone: (412) 937-2804 |
Webmasters
message |
|
